Incremental Value of Gift Cards
Drilling Down Newsletter #87 3/2008
Drilling Down - Turning Customer
Data into Profits with a Spreadsheet
Customer Valuation, Retention,
Get the Drilling Down Book!
Hi Folks, Jim Novo here.
Gift Cards have certainly become a big deal in the world of retail,
but financial success may depend on which end of the transaction you
are on. This month we discuss the when and how of incremental
Gift Cards profit.
Over on the blog it was Social Media month, with a couple of
articles discussing why the value of Print and Digital communications
diverge for different purposes. At the same time, the results of
a Lab Store test kicked off a wide ranging discussion on the
effectiveness of display ads in Social Media.
A lot on the menu, let's get to that Drillin'...
Best Customer Marketing Articles
For Marketers, Print Outperforms Digital
There are actually two articles on this page dealing with the
print / digital divide - or the lack of it - both from the Wharton
School. The first discusses the idea that digital may be
impersonal whereas paper has a larger emotional impact. The
second and related article is about Professional versus Amateur
content generation and the role of editors.
To access the full article review and links to the articles
Sample Marketing Productivity Blog Posts
Boards vs Social Media
March 6, 2008
Engaged to Pay Attention?
March 11, 2008
These posts were kicked off by an AdSense
Test for the Lab
Store that eliminated Social Media as a source during
optimization. The posts discuss the ins and outs of successful
display advertising and offer a theory on why display seems to fail on
Social Media sites.
Questions from Fellow Drillers
Incremental Value of Gift Cards
Q: I found your web site through a Google search on "incremental business"
and "gift cards"-- but, then again, you probably already know that.
Didn't find anything specific to "gift cards" on your site, but I'm wondering
your opinion of them as CRM tools?
A: Well, as I'm sure you know, they can be used in lots of different ways.
From an incremental perspective, some approaches are not so profitable and others
Q: My quest at the moment is to try to help a client "prove" the
incrementality of the business produced through gift cards and what avenues of sale might be more profitable than others.
Is there a correlation to this quest and information in your book, i.e., marketing model
versus financial model, success based not on "response" but
A: That's pretty much what the entire book is about - how do you set up, test,
and measure these kinds of ideas? The marketing model IS the financial
model, from my perspective.
Q: By the way, I'm not the only one pondering this in my industry.
Might be a topic you want to explore in your future endeavors which would be of
interest to a host of us.
A: OK, let's do some of that. My answers to e-mails like this frequently
become newsletter or blog material (and I won't reveal who asked the question), so
perhaps I can both help you and get some writing done!
From a broad perspective, I don't think there is any way to know the answer
to your question without testing using control
groups, and the ability of the client to execute on that idea can
be limited if they are a mass retailer. Plus, you have not told me anything about your client or how
they promote the cards. So we probably have to speculate based on what we know about behavior in general
from other sources - loyalty programs and so forth.
In my mind, there's no question that some portion of the gift card business
You start with the breakage - cards not ever redeemed. If I give a gift
card to someone who doesn't use it - $8 billion in gift card sales last year
are in this bucket - then as the retailer ISSUER (as opposed to the gift
card seller) I have to be in the black on it, from an operational
perspective. I can't see any way there's no incremental profit in that
idea. Incremental SALES, maybe not, but profits? Have to be there,
industry as a whole.
In case the above is not clear, the issuer would be where the card is
redeemed. Originally this point of clarification would not be required but
as you know, now there are lots of stores that sell gift cards from other
retailers! Whether that kind of operation is incremental to the SELLER of
the card is a merchandising issue, but I'm pretty sure it is incremental to the
ISSUER - the store where the card is to be redeemed - based on the
So, if your client is a retailer, an ISSUER that sells their own cards,
either through their own store or other stores, than I'm pretty sure there
is incremental business there. If they are a seller of other store's cards,
or a processor of some kind, then I'm not sure.
But let's say 100% of cards are redeemed. Now it's a little more tricky,
you have to look at the incremental cost of the cards / processing versus
the "float" on the money. This is a pretty simple equation.
The costs are whatever premium may be charged for the creation / processing of the cards
versus the interest on the money taken in from the sale of the
For example, if the average "days to redemption" of a card is 90 days, and the
average value of a card is $100, and the interest I can get on that $100 is
4%, then I make $1 ($100 x 4% / 1/4 of a year) for every $100 card I sell
just on the "float". If the incremental costs (say, versus a regular
credit card transaction) to issue and redeem this card is less than $1, then
as the Issuing retailer I am making the difference as incremental profit -
even if there is 100% redemption, for sure is not the case.
Now, if the retailer is doing something else with these cards - using them
as rewards, store of value, etc. - the story could be different.
For example, "buy $100 worth of merchandise and we will give you a
card" or "redeem your loyalty points for a gift card".
That's a different story, now the card is not a "product" it's a transactional device / store of value and that changes the dynamics.
this case, the card is no different than issuing coupons and now you
can get into problems because these kinds of promotions tend to attract best
customers, and their purchases using the card may not be incremental.
As far as incremental profit goes, now you stand a good chance of being in
the hole, at least with the best customer segment. And since frequently the
volume of losses in this "best" segment for promotions like this will dwarf
any gains from these promotions on any other segments, you end up in the hole on
a net basis with incremental profit.
Put another way, the best, most engaged customers are highly likely
to purchase anyway and giving them a discount changes nothing about
their spend, they simply buy the same amount at a discount. This
aggregate discount is usually greater than the aggregate incremental
profit on not-so-best customers, so the entire promotion operates at a
The good news is this: the actual incremental profit of programs like these
is simpler to measure, because you have all the transactional data and
you can control / put parameters around the issuance. Typically in a
scenario like this you would look to set issuance rules that threshold above
the average spend rate of the customer segment.
So, for example, let's say the average monthly spend of a best customer is
$80 or $960 a year. The correct promotion then looks like this: buy $100
worth of merchandise **this month** and we will give you a $5 gift card.
Hopefully, at minimum you would see a total spend of $980 that year -
$20 more than average. You would be on your way to incremental profits at this point,
depending on what margins are.
What you *do not* want to see is the customer spend $100 during the promo month and then spend $60 the month
after, which is a typical thing that happens with best customers.
This is a sign you are not driving incremental sales, you are simply moving the
existing spend around and giving up $5 in profit as you do it.
For more on setting up these kinds of tests and measuring effects, see
Hope that gives you - and the rest of your industry - a starting place!
Q: You have however validated my thinking that we can't measure
incrementality without creating control groups. In asking the question, I
was second guessing myself and wondering if there was something I was missing.
I think to some degree we can use existing sales data to measure uplift (either over the value of the card itself or over the client's
average transaction) for the current purpose which would move them to the
next phase of specifically measuring incrementality. For this, I'm sure
your book will be helpful and I shall use it accordingly.
A: Yes. Along those lines, in the "threshold" example, we have seen
a $10 off $50 generate an average sale of $120. Given the customer segment
had an average purchase of $45 - hence the $10 off $50 - it would be safe to
assume there's some incremental in there, and long as the customer segment spend
doesn't tank by $70 or so over the next several months, you could assume
pretty safely you have incremental profit.
"Proof" is another thing, but if you're dealing with pure retail,
proof is a matter of degree, you take what you can get.
Q: P.S. Your point about the promotional use of cards, this company has
separate business units which are their own P&L centers. So, while the
promotional use of cards might be incremental to the business unit which
runs gift cards, it's only incremental to the company to the degree that
it produced new business or "stole" it from a competitor less than value
of the gift cards it took to produce. Again, greatly value your time and
A: Yes, well, that's quite another matter, and gift cards are not the "root
cause", if you know what I mean. There is a long tradition of
"intra-company sales theft" between divisions that seemingly goes unchecked.
A lot of direct marketing companies are sensitive to this, but that's because they can measure it...and even then, there are few who have really
unlocked the riddle of how much / where / when it happens, especially relative to web
sites versus catalogs and retail stores.
Anyway, this is a "governance" question (strategic), not a marketing / gift
card question (tactical). If a company really wants to measure channibalization,
they can by setting up specific tests and using control
groups to measure outcomes. The question is, do they really
want to know the answer?
If you are a consultant, agency, or software developer with clients
needing action-oriented customer intelligence or High ROI Customer
Marketing program designs, click
That's it for this month's edition of the Drilling Down newsletter.
If you like the newsletter, please forward it to a friend! Subscription instructions are top and bottom of this page.
Any comments on the newsletter (it's too long, too short, topic
suggestions, etc.) please send them right along to me, along with any
other questions on customer Valuation, Retention, Loyalty, and
'Til next time, keep Drilling Down!
- Jim Novo
Copyright 2008, The Drilling Down Project by Jim Novo. All
rights reserved. You are free to use material from this
newsletter in whole or in part as long as you include complete
credits, including live web site link and e-mail link. Please
tell me where the material will appear.